Come May! Every Thursday (starting 5/1) we shall be diving into Lady Audley's Secret by Mary Elizabeth Braddon. I have never read this before, and I hope you have not either, because there are SECRETS, but even if you have, come along with us and spoil nothing, for it is time for...Lady Audley's Secret Readalong.
↧
Lady Audley's Secret Readalong!
↧
Maybe shame-based competition WOULD solve our nation's problems
I went to my hometown this weekend of Champaign, Illinois. Champaign is located in the center of the state (basically), but if you talk to someone from Chicago, they will say it's in "southern Illinois." This is because people from the Chicago area are tools and think everything south of Chicago is southern Illinois. THE REASON THIS IS INSULTING is that in Champaign, WE make fun of that area. We do not wish to be included in it. They have southernish accents because of being on the border with Kentucky and Missouri, and they're all farmers. I think. True, Champaign is surrounded by cornfields, but we have an EXCELLENT university. A university that smells like cow manure when the wind is right, but an excellent university nonetheless.
Anyway.
The Champaign Public Library was one of my favorite places in Champaign growing up. It was the only place of note I could walk to from my parents', it had microfilm machines so I could do research on whatever weird topics had found me that week (also I got to pretend I was about to crack a murder case, because why else do people look through microfilm? certainly not to print out opera reviews from the '70s, I can tell you that), and the VHS section enabled my obsessions from Kathryn Grayson to Barbara Stanwyck in an era where there was Blockbuster or nothing.
The old Champaign library was hiiiiideous. Mainly because it had been built in the 1970s, a decade when there should have been a moratorium on architecture -- "Hey, we seem to be designing things terribly. Let's just sit this out until it fixes itself" -- but I loved its aesthetically unpleasant corrugated aluminum siding. I just searched for a photo of it, but no one took one because it was too ugly.
Champaign has a rivalry with its twin city Urbana. Imagine if Democrats and Republicans were each given free rein of a town, and you have Urbana-Champaign. Everything in Urbana is very pretty and very old and very poorly maintained because they never have money. Everything in Champaign is commerce-driven and shiny and kinda sorta soulless. And we were shamed -- SHAMED -- by the Urbana Free Library (get over yourselves, Urbana, all public libraries are free) because it was this big beautiful stone edifice built in 1918 and we had our ugly stepsister library next door because our city didn't care enough about making its library pretty.
UNTIL. UNTIL ONE DAY, when I can only assume a councilman said "Fuck this, we're getting a better library than Urbana" and we built this marvelous creation:
I miss the building I walked to on the weekends and drove to first thing after I got my license, but I'm not an idiot. I'm not going to bemoan the fact that the children of Champaign now have to deal with a gorgeous library with a successful self checkout system that Chicago tried and failed at. And there's a FriendShop in the basement where you can buy donated or discarded books, and it's raised $50,000 for extra programs so far. I bought these:
Champaign's library is awesome. I'm super proud of it. It weirdly gives me hope for Republicans. Maybe if we say things like "Hey, y'know, uh, Mexico's got awesome healthcare," they'll be like "SCREW MEXICO, USA #1 WE'LL GET THE BEST HEALTHCARE IN THE WORLD." And then we can fix all our problems. One can only hope.
Anyway.
![]() |
I am writing a post solely so I can use this gif |
The Champaign Public Library was one of my favorite places in Champaign growing up. It was the only place of note I could walk to from my parents', it had microfilm machines so I could do research on whatever weird topics had found me that week (also I got to pretend I was about to crack a murder case, because why else do people look through microfilm? certainly not to print out opera reviews from the '70s, I can tell you that), and the VHS section enabled my obsessions from Kathryn Grayson to Barbara Stanwyck in an era where there was Blockbuster or nothing.
The old Champaign library was hiiiiideous. Mainly because it had been built in the 1970s, a decade when there should have been a moratorium on architecture -- "Hey, we seem to be designing things terribly. Let's just sit this out until it fixes itself" -- but I loved its aesthetically unpleasant corrugated aluminum siding. I just searched for a photo of it, but no one took one because it was too ugly.
Champaign has a rivalry with its twin city Urbana. Imagine if Democrats and Republicans were each given free rein of a town, and you have Urbana-Champaign. Everything in Urbana is very pretty and very old and very poorly maintained because they never have money. Everything in Champaign is commerce-driven and shiny and kinda sorta soulless. And we were shamed -- SHAMED -- by the Urbana Free Library (get over yourselves, Urbana, all public libraries are free) because it was this big beautiful stone edifice built in 1918 and we had our ugly stepsister library next door because our city didn't care enough about making its library pretty.
UNTIL. UNTIL ONE DAY, when I can only assume a councilman said "Fuck this, we're getting a better library than Urbana" and we built this marvelous creation:
![]() |
AIR AND LIGHT |
I miss the building I walked to on the weekends and drove to first thing after I got my license, but I'm not an idiot. I'm not going to bemoan the fact that the children of Champaign now have to deal with a gorgeous library with a successful self checkout system that Chicago tried and failed at. And there's a FriendShop in the basement where you can buy donated or discarded books, and it's raised $50,000 for extra programs so far. I bought these:
![]() |
This was like $7 |
Champaign's library is awesome. I'm super proud of it. It weirdly gives me hope for Republicans. Maybe if we say things like "Hey, y'know, uh, Mexico's got awesome healthcare," they'll be like "SCREW MEXICO, USA #1 WE'LL GET THE BEST HEALTHCARE IN THE WORLD." And then we can fix all our problems. One can only hope.
↧
↧
But judging history makes me and my friends feel so good about ourselves
I went on the same rant a NUMBER of times yesterday, including on Twitter, to my brother on Gchat, to my friend at dinner, and to another friend on the phone after dinner. This rant was about, of course, judging things out of their historical context.
Sure, it's really easy and kind of fun to look back on the past with a condescending smile, shake your head at their opinions and ways of life and just swagger about, content in your superiority, but oh, hold on -- I think that might be a thing that assholes do.
The world (by which I mean "the West," which is an example of ME being an asshole) seems to be moving forward regarding social issues. We are getting better. But it's not any one of us that's causing that. We know not to be jerks to transgender people and not to throw eggs at black people and not to yell slurs at gay people and not to put Japanese people in internment camps NOT because we just know that with our superior, shiny brains, but because society as a whole has gotten to the point where its overall knowledge knows that that is wrong. But we're still screwing things up, and in 70 years, people are going to look at us with condescending smiles and go "Well, they might've gotten gay marriage right, but look at equal pay for women and gender binary problems and A MILLION OTHER THINGS."
This is like the genius 19-year-olds in my 18th Century British Lit class who decided Lady Mary Wortley Montagu was racist in 1715 Constantinople. Really? Was she? Because records indicate she was learning Arabic and thought the veil was freeing and not actually restrictive, and that's actually kind of amazing for 1715 and if YOU lived then you'd probably ask her if she was becoming a Turk and then laugh lightly while fluttering your fan.
If you find something out about a historical figure that makes them seem less-than-enlightened, 1) What a shock. 2) How much do you expect of this person? Do you know how hard it is to go against ANY prevailing opinion of your time, let alone all of them? Have you tried telling anyone that you didn't think Frozen was good? Because let me tell you, the 15 minutes after that statement are not pleasant.
So let's change that to a majorly disputed and highly charged social and/or political issue. Let's say you take a stand on one of those. Oh -- I'm sorry -- the Future would like you to take a stand on ALL of them, and please choose the incredibly unpopular side, because the Future would like to not feel uncomfortable about you while reading Wikipedia.
Don't judge things out of the context of their time. That's what dumb people do.
![]() |
Don't do that thing |
Sure, it's really easy and kind of fun to look back on the past with a condescending smile, shake your head at their opinions and ways of life and just swagger about, content in your superiority, but oh, hold on -- I think that might be a thing that assholes do.
![]() |
Over there. Go. |
The world (by which I mean "the West," which is an example of ME being an asshole) seems to be moving forward regarding social issues. We are getting better. But it's not any one of us that's causing that. We know not to be jerks to transgender people and not to throw eggs at black people and not to yell slurs at gay people and not to put Japanese people in internment camps NOT because we just know that with our superior, shiny brains, but because society as a whole has gotten to the point where its overall knowledge knows that that is wrong. But we're still screwing things up, and in 70 years, people are going to look at us with condescending smiles and go "Well, they might've gotten gay marriage right, but look at equal pay for women and gender binary problems and A MILLION OTHER THINGS."
This is like the genius 19-year-olds in my 18th Century British Lit class who decided Lady Mary Wortley Montagu was racist in 1715 Constantinople. Really? Was she? Because records indicate she was learning Arabic and thought the veil was freeing and not actually restrictive, and that's actually kind of amazing for 1715 and if YOU lived then you'd probably ask her if she was becoming a Turk and then laugh lightly while fluttering your fan.
If you find something out about a historical figure that makes them seem less-than-enlightened, 1) What a shock. 2) How much do you expect of this person? Do you know how hard it is to go against ANY prevailing opinion of your time, let alone all of them? Have you tried telling anyone that you didn't think Frozen was good? Because let me tell you, the 15 minutes after that statement are not pleasant.
So let's change that to a majorly disputed and highly charged social and/or political issue. Let's say you take a stand on one of those. Oh -- I'm sorry -- the Future would like you to take a stand on ALL of them, and please choose the incredibly unpopular side, because the Future would like to not feel uncomfortable about you while reading Wikipedia.
Don't judge things out of the context of their time. That's what dumb people do.
↧
The Shame of Literary Opinion Take-Backsies
You know how sometimes you might be a person with strong opinions who will brook no opposition? At least not without yelling "YOU ARE FULL OF WRONGY WRONGNESS" at said opposition? Yes, well, as of 80 pages into Game of Thrones, I would like to confess with clenched teeth that I was...maybe...sort of wrong about it.
I tried it before and found it lacking! Or rather, I found it dumb. Because I could not handle Eddard Stark being all "By the Kingdom of Spellweather, the Isles of Kiddlypoo, and the Four Corners of Bunbury" because that is silly. But it turns out, if you keep reading past that and also indulge in some skimming, it's a really entertaining book.
Parts have been spoiled for me, because I've had the following conversation on NUMEROUS occasions:
"Tell me why Tumblr is saying this stuff about Game of Thrones."
"No! It'll ruin it if you ever read them."
"I am never, ever, ever going to read them."
"But--"
"Never."
Fortunately, I am terrible at remembering things like "plot" and only good at remembering things like Queen Elizabeth I's birthday, because it is USEFUL. So I've forgotten most of what people have told me.
The fun part about having strong opinions is -- what am I saying, it is OBJECTIVELY fun. When I was in high school, one of the things that irritated me the most was when the teacher would ask whether something was A or B and my classmates (otherwise regarded with great affection) would obnoxiously answer "Well, it's a little bit of both."
AGHHHH.
Life is grey areas. Grey grey grey grey grey. Almost nothing is black and white. But to foster discussion, sometimes you need to throw something out like "CUBS SUCK WHITE SOX RULE," because someone's face will turn angry-red and you will have a fun argument which will end in you both agreeing that Cubs FANS suck, and you in fact have no problem with the team, aside from the fact that they are terrible at baseball.
The problem with something like Game of Thrones opposition is you have 1) Your opinion based on reading one chapter, which you called "stupid," and 2) NATIONS of people against you and your dislike. I've discussed before how bad it is to hate something because it's popular, but it's a really, really hard urge to overcome. It's totally a douchey thing to do, but it's there, like that desire you sometimes have to wear an Ed Hardy shirt, or to say "I don't know, CAN you go to the bathroom?"
Conquering these douchebag feelings is what make us better humans, and improves the quality of life for our fellow man. So I shall say RIGHT NOW that I was wrong. Game of Thrones is very entertaining. I am totally looking forward to reading about basically every character. But I will continue to be annoyed by Sherlock fans now and forever, amen.
I tried it before and found it lacking! Or rather, I found it dumb. Because I could not handle Eddard Stark being all "By the Kingdom of Spellweather, the Isles of Kiddlypoo, and the Four Corners of Bunbury" because that is silly. But it turns out, if you keep reading past that and also indulge in some skimming, it's a really entertaining book.
Parts have been spoiled for me, because I've had the following conversation on NUMEROUS occasions:
"Tell me why Tumblr is saying this stuff about Game of Thrones."
"No! It'll ruin it if you ever read them."
"I am never, ever, ever going to read them."
"But--"
"Never."
Fortunately, I am terrible at remembering things like "plot" and only good at remembering things like Queen Elizabeth I's birthday, because it is USEFUL. So I've forgotten most of what people have told me.
The fun part about having strong opinions is -- what am I saying, it is OBJECTIVELY fun. When I was in high school, one of the things that irritated me the most was when the teacher would ask whether something was A or B and my classmates (otherwise regarded with great affection) would obnoxiously answer "Well, it's a little bit of both."
AGHHHH.
Life is grey areas. Grey grey grey grey grey. Almost nothing is black and white. But to foster discussion, sometimes you need to throw something out like "CUBS SUCK WHITE SOX RULE," because someone's face will turn angry-red and you will have a fun argument which will end in you both agreeing that Cubs FANS suck, and you in fact have no problem with the team, aside from the fact that they are terrible at baseball.
The problem with something like Game of Thrones opposition is you have 1) Your opinion based on reading one chapter, which you called "stupid," and 2) NATIONS of people against you and your dislike. I've discussed before how bad it is to hate something because it's popular, but it's a really, really hard urge to overcome. It's totally a douchey thing to do, but it's there, like that desire you sometimes have to wear an Ed Hardy shirt, or to say "I don't know, CAN you go to the bathroom?"
Conquering these douchebag feelings is what make us better humans, and improves the quality of life for our fellow man. So I shall say RIGHT NOW that I was wrong. Game of Thrones is very entertaining. I am totally looking forward to reading about basically every character. But I will continue to be annoyed by Sherlock fans now and forever, amen.
↧
Lady Audley's Super-Secret Readalong Schedule
I forgot this was a thing that started this week because May has CREPT UP ON ME. So okay. The way this book is broken up will not be NEARLY as awesome as Bleak House, as I have not read it yet. We're gonna go seven posts, starting this Thursday. I just skimmed chapters one through four, and they are pretty much super-short, so READ ON and then let's post about how we have no idea who Mary Elizabeth Braddon is and how are we liking the way she writes ladies?
May 1st - Chapter One through Four
May 8th - Chapters Five through Nine
May 15th - Chapters Ten through Fifteen
May 22nd - Chapters 16 through 23
May 29th - Chapters 24 through 30
June 5th - Chapters 31 through 35
June 12th - Chapters 36 to End of Book
↧
↧
C2E2 Is a Joy and a Treasure
The people of San Diego have Comic Con. Atlanta has Dragon Con. New York has NYCC. And the people of London get all the Amanda Tapping conventions, which isn't fair but fine.
Chicago has C2E2, which is a giant comic convention held in our giant convention center, McCormick Place -- the LARGEST convention center in North America, and while not named after Cyrus McCormick, famous for inventing the mechanical reaper, it WAS named after someone in his family. I had never gone to this convention in my six years of living in Chicago, primarily because A) I didn't know how to get to McCormick Place, B) I don't like comics, C) I needed to make someone go with me.
ALL OF THOSE PROBLEMS WERE SOLVED THIS YEAR, as my friend Emily wanted to go (and I made Doug go); we found out about a shuttle that took you from downtown to McCormick; and I read that Jaime Murray from Warehouse 13 was going to be there, whom I like MUCHLY. So we were a merry party of three, losing each other frequently, whereupon we shouted each other's names into the crowd until we were reunited like the end of Homeward Bound (except for that one time when Doug was buying a flask that looked like an NES cartridge and wandered off and Emily and I gave him up for lost and looked at Doctor Who buttons for ten minutes).
The convention floor was huge. Huge. With panels held on the second floor (we attended one and wandered into a couple of others) and all the exhibitors and booths on the main floor. We got there at about 10:30 and Doug and I trudged back to the shuttle around 6, our brains gone and our legs useless. Because we saw EVERYTHING. Or, okay, not everything. But we saw like...3/4 of the convention floor. I think. Still not sure. Pretty big place.
But okay, imagine you're a person who gets excited about ANY POP CULTURE REFERENCE, and then put yourself in a comic con and watch as your brain explodes. (you: "how would I watch--""Don't worry about it.") But the entire day consisted of me seeing someone dressed as something I liked and then chasing after them with my camera.
We went to a quiz panel called Geek Geek Revolution, because Pat Rothfuss was going to be there and I had specifically purchased The Name of the Wind (which I have not finished reading but think is excellent) in HARDCOVER for him to sign, and then I found out his only signing day was Friday and so I was basically determined to stalk him until my book was signed.
So there we stood, waiting in line outside the panel room, with Emily and me desperately plugging our phones into whatever sockets the line passed for two minutes at a time, and we were finally right outside the door about to go in, holding our phone charging equipment and multitudinous bags, when I realized Pat Rothfuss was standing RIGHT there, trying to have a conversation with someone, and I PANICKED, shoved my phone stuff into Emily's hands, said something like "GOINTHEREWITHOUTME" and stood, pen in hand, fingers digging into my backpack for this damn hardcover I'd been carrying around all day, and to his credit, Mr Rothfuss did not even blink at the presence of this tiny, anxious-looking person shoving a book at him while saying "I'M HERE BECAUSE OF YOU." He just said he had to sign really quickly, did so, and boom.
The panel turned out to be hilarious, which is good because we only went so I could jump out at Pat Rothfuss after, and since my goal was completed before, now we were in this room for we didn't even know what (I have nice friends). But the quiz panel was Seth Fishman (sci-fi writer, wrote The Well's End), Kevin Hearne (writes Star Wars novels and knows a LOT about Dune), Pat Rothfuss (score), and Lydia Kang, author of Control and the SOLE female representative. A lot was riding on Lydia.
They asked questions related to sci-fi, fantasy and nerd culture, and if an audience member turned in a question that would stump the panel, they got a tote bag of books from Penguin. Questions That Stumped involved Sailor Moon, Fight Club AND THE X-FILES (guess which one was mine). But seriously, how do you NOT know which X-Files episode Bryan Cranston guest starred in? It was NOTABLE at the time because he was the dad from Malcolm in the Middle and here he was playing a serious part, what? What, Bryan Cranston? You don't do dramas.
Lydia Kang kicked EVERYONE'S ass. It was so satisfying. She has a ridiculous amount of nerd knowledge, spanning fantasy, sci-fi and random movie trivia. She knows what the "K" in Ursula K. Le Guin stands for. She knows the first fantasy book to make it onto the NYT bestseller list (Sword of Shannara by Terry Brooks). She will rattle off all the Starks' direwolf names for you. She is awesome. And the panel was joyous and nerdy and Seth Fishman got last place so they made him wear a Jar Jar Binks mask.
This is what I love about fan culture. And I can't write about it objectively at all, because it makes me so happy. Fan culture is entirely wrapped around people being excited about something. All these people were gathered in this GIANT place because they love things. Not all the same things, but if you talk with a nerd at a nerd convention, you're probably gonna find at least one thing you have in common. Like how much you want to pet Falcor from The Neverending Story (SO MUCH). So the atmosphere is jubilant and bouncy and people keep running into people dressed as something they love, and they get SO JAZZED and it's like that all day. Fans aren't afraid to make themselves vulnerable, lose all possible claim to looking like a badass who doesn't need anybody, and to just jump up and down going "THEY'RE COSPLAYING THE FAIRLY ODDPARENTS."
And while I'd heard all sorts of negative crap about misogyny and terribleness from gamer guys and sci-fi people, it was 100% not in evidence at C2E2. At least from the fans. The attendees seemed pretty evenly split, gender-wise, and I didn't see any guys being gross around the inevitable Slave Leias, or yelling at a girl for dressing up like Thor, or being jackasses in any way. Everyone just seemed excited to be there. The only grossness I saw was from some of the older men in Artists' Alley, because wow, guys. Really? We're still drawing women like that? It's 2014. Maybe stop being dumb and talk to an actual lady and learn that they're people. Just like you! Amazing.
If I could be around fans all the time, that would be almost beyond the reach of my happiest imaginings. But I'm resigned to one time a year where I can see this:
Chicago has C2E2, which is a giant comic convention held in our giant convention center, McCormick Place -- the LARGEST convention center in North America, and while not named after Cyrus McCormick, famous for inventing the mechanical reaper, it WAS named after someone in his family. I had never gone to this convention in my six years of living in Chicago, primarily because A) I didn't know how to get to McCormick Place, B) I don't like comics, C) I needed to make someone go with me.
ALL OF THOSE PROBLEMS WERE SOLVED THIS YEAR, as my friend Emily wanted to go (and I made Doug go); we found out about a shuttle that took you from downtown to McCormick; and I read that Jaime Murray from Warehouse 13 was going to be there, whom I like MUCHLY. So we were a merry party of three, losing each other frequently, whereupon we shouted each other's names into the crowd until we were reunited like the end of Homeward Bound (except for that one time when Doug was buying a flask that looked like an NES cartridge and wandered off and Emily and I gave him up for lost and looked at Doctor Who buttons for ten minutes).
![]() |
This is just the entryway to the building -- not even to the hall |
The convention floor was huge. Huge. With panels held on the second floor (we attended one and wandered into a couple of others) and all the exhibitors and booths on the main floor. We got there at about 10:30 and Doug and I trudged back to the shuttle around 6, our brains gone and our legs useless. Because we saw EVERYTHING. Or, okay, not everything. But we saw like...3/4 of the convention floor. I think. Still not sure. Pretty big place.
But okay, imagine you're a person who gets excited about ANY POP CULTURE REFERENCE, and then put yourself in a comic con and watch as your brain explodes. (you: "how would I watch--""Don't worry about it.") But the entire day consisted of me seeing someone dressed as something I liked and then chasing after them with my camera.
So there we stood, waiting in line outside the panel room, with Emily and me desperately plugging our phones into whatever sockets the line passed for two minutes at a time, and we were finally right outside the door about to go in, holding our phone charging equipment and multitudinous bags, when I realized Pat Rothfuss was standing RIGHT there, trying to have a conversation with someone, and I PANICKED, shoved my phone stuff into Emily's hands, said something like "GOINTHEREWITHOUTME" and stood, pen in hand, fingers digging into my backpack for this damn hardcover I'd been carrying around all day, and to his credit, Mr Rothfuss did not even blink at the presence of this tiny, anxious-looking person shoving a book at him while saying "I'M HERE BECAUSE OF YOU." He just said he had to sign really quickly, did so, and boom.
![]() |
I'll explain the other one in a sec |
The panel turned out to be hilarious, which is good because we only went so I could jump out at Pat Rothfuss after, and since my goal was completed before, now we were in this room for we didn't even know what (I have nice friends). But the quiz panel was Seth Fishman (sci-fi writer, wrote The Well's End), Kevin Hearne (writes Star Wars novels and knows a LOT about Dune), Pat Rothfuss (score), and Lydia Kang, author of Control and the SOLE female representative. A lot was riding on Lydia.
They asked questions related to sci-fi, fantasy and nerd culture, and if an audience member turned in a question that would stump the panel, they got a tote bag of books from Penguin. Questions That Stumped involved Sailor Moon, Fight Club AND THE X-FILES (guess which one was mine). But seriously, how do you NOT know which X-Files episode Bryan Cranston guest starred in? It was NOTABLE at the time because he was the dad from Malcolm in the Middle and here he was playing a serious part, what? What, Bryan Cranston? You don't do dramas.
![]() |
How we all knew him then |
Lydia Kang kicked EVERYONE'S ass. It was so satisfying. She has a ridiculous amount of nerd knowledge, spanning fantasy, sci-fi and random movie trivia. She knows what the "K" in Ursula K. Le Guin stands for. She knows the first fantasy book to make it onto the NYT bestseller list (Sword of Shannara by Terry Brooks). She will rattle off all the Starks' direwolf names for you. She is awesome. And the panel was joyous and nerdy and Seth Fishman got last place so they made him wear a Jar Jar Binks mask.
![]() |
these are my people |
This is what I love about fan culture. And I can't write about it objectively at all, because it makes me so happy. Fan culture is entirely wrapped around people being excited about something. All these people were gathered in this GIANT place because they love things. Not all the same things, but if you talk with a nerd at a nerd convention, you're probably gonna find at least one thing you have in common. Like how much you want to pet Falcor from The Neverending Story (SO MUCH). So the atmosphere is jubilant and bouncy and people keep running into people dressed as something they love, and they get SO JAZZED and it's like that all day. Fans aren't afraid to make themselves vulnerable, lose all possible claim to looking like a badass who doesn't need anybody, and to just jump up and down going "THEY'RE COSPLAYING THE FAIRLY ODDPARENTS."
And while I'd heard all sorts of negative crap about misogyny and terribleness from gamer guys and sci-fi people, it was 100% not in evidence at C2E2. At least from the fans. The attendees seemed pretty evenly split, gender-wise, and I didn't see any guys being gross around the inevitable Slave Leias, or yelling at a girl for dressing up like Thor, or being jackasses in any way. Everyone just seemed excited to be there. The only grossness I saw was from some of the older men in Artists' Alley, because wow, guys. Really? We're still drawing women like that? It's 2014. Maybe stop being dumb and talk to an actual lady and learn that they're people. Just like you! Amazing.
If I could be around fans all the time, that would be almost beyond the reach of my happiest imaginings. But I'm resigned to one time a year where I can see this:
And the one time a year when I can take pictures of Doug doing this:
![]() |
"Diplomacy: The Game" |
The only reason Emily wanted to go was because the artist Karen Hallion was there, and we've both bought prints from her. She most famously does Disney princesses + the TARDIS drawings, but I bought this (which she siiiiigned) and Emily got the Belle/TARDIS print that she already has a shirt of, and we basically fangirled all over Karen Hallion and she was fine with it, so thanks for not being weirded out by your fans, Ms Hallion.
Part of the reason I could barely move Sunday was because I spent seven hours carrying around bags filled with books. I did not realize comic conventions gave you free books. DID NOT KNOW. I'm now terrified of BEA, because I left C2E2 with these:
Which are the ones I got for free. I also bought these:
Because the savvy lady at the Quirk Books booth HAGGLED with me. She said "All the books are discounted," and I'd been wanting to get The Thorn and the Blossom because it is packaged EXCELLENTLY, but when she said it was $15 when the list price was $17, I went "Meh" and started walking away and she said "I can let you have it for $13." SOLD. I did not even know haggling was a possibility, so color me excited. I got the X-Files comic book because it's season 10 and the creator was right there, and Emily pointed it out to me, and then yelled at me for spending more money. How about you not point out X-Files things if you don't want me to buy them, Emily. How about that thing.
I also got Jaime Murray to sign my copy of War of the Worlds, because, you see, she PLAYS H.G. Wells on Warehouse 13. Because WH13 is awesome and was all "How about if H.G. is a lady?" So that was damn exciting.
To close it on up, I show my backpack pre- and post-con. It was good times.
↧
Lady Audley's Super-Secret Readlong Week 1: Bales of Stupid Wool
Oh wow, is it time for...LADY AUDLEY'S SUPER-SECRET READALONG?
It is, and if you forgot, it's okay because I did too until Laura reminded me on Tuesday. But it was only FOUR chapters, which was about 23 pages, so...you could just knock that out right now. ANYWAY.
Our story begins with a description of a house, which is an attention-grabber if I've ever seen one. Maybe you should've joined some kind of a writing circle, MEB. 'Cause if I'd been in it with you, it would've been like:
"You're, uh....you're STARTING with the house description?"
"Well, when I read books I like knowing right off where I am, so this'll set people up nicely."
"Yeah, but...y'know, if I picked up a book and the first two pages were a really boring description of a house, I'd probably put it down."
"What if it had 'SECRET' in the title?"
"...I'd give you two more pages."
I realized in the first few chapters that I'd been conflating Lady Audley's Secret with Mrs Warren's Profession, and oops, I don't think our Lucy runs a whorehouse. What her secret is in its secrety completeness, I don't know yet, because I thought it was all "UGH she's gonna be married to this seafaring gentleman and now she's a bigamist and I guess this'll be a soap opera."
BUT NO. Because PLOT TWIST at the end of chapter 4. All right, Mary Elizabeth Braddon, you have my attention. At times my grossed out attention, because remember Doug's Pride and Prejudice post? The one where he said "I'm going to create an Internet start-up dedicated to 19th century English literature fandom. It shall be called cousin-fuckers.co.uk."
"They were first cousins, and had been play fellows in childhood, and sweethearts in early youth."
It's not even like in Jane Eyre or Pride and Prejudice where they'd never met before! They grew up together! As did their PARENTS. Because their parents had the same parents. "[W]hen you're my wife you won't have overmuch time for gentility, my girl," the author wrote as if this were totally fine and not going to result in children with webbed feet.
Yeah, so we have Lady Audley's maid, who I guess is now going to blackmail her, and all right. I get that, girl. It's not good, but if I were a Victorian era servant and marrying my cousin who kind of seems like an asshole, I also might steal a baby shoe so I could open a bar.
HOW DO WE FEEL ABOUT MEB'S WRITING OF LADIES? And have you read her Wikipedia page? Because not only was she a scandalous actress who wrote a zillion novels, but she lived with a guy whose wife was in an asylum and founded a magazine and hm, I do not know what to make of you, Braddon.
P.S. My mind is way too in the gutter to deal with that proposal scene. I just...nope.
It is, and if you forgot, it's okay because I did too until Laura reminded me on Tuesday. But it was only FOUR chapters, which was about 23 pages, so...you could just knock that out right now. ANYWAY.
Our story begins with a description of a house, which is an attention-grabber if I've ever seen one. Maybe you should've joined some kind of a writing circle, MEB. 'Cause if I'd been in it with you, it would've been like:
"You're, uh....you're STARTING with the house description?"
"Well, when I read books I like knowing right off where I am, so this'll set people up nicely."
"Yeah, but...y'know, if I picked up a book and the first two pages were a really boring description of a house, I'd probably put it down."
"What if it had 'SECRET' in the title?"
"...I'd give you two more pages."
I realized in the first few chapters that I'd been conflating Lady Audley's Secret with Mrs Warren's Profession, and oops, I don't think our Lucy runs a whorehouse. What her secret is in its secrety completeness, I don't know yet, because I thought it was all "UGH she's gonna be married to this seafaring gentleman and now she's a bigamist and I guess this'll be a soap opera."
![]() |
Although soap operas are pretty great |
BUT NO. Because PLOT TWIST at the end of chapter 4. All right, Mary Elizabeth Braddon, you have my attention. At times my grossed out attention, because remember Doug's Pride and Prejudice post? The one where he said "I'm going to create an Internet start-up dedicated to 19th century English literature fandom. It shall be called cousin-fuckers.co.uk."
"They were first cousins, and had been play fellows in childhood, and sweethearts in early youth."
It's not even like in Jane Eyre or Pride and Prejudice where they'd never met before! They grew up together! As did their PARENTS. Because their parents had the same parents. "[W]hen you're my wife you won't have overmuch time for gentility, my girl," the author wrote as if this were totally fine and not going to result in children with webbed feet.
Yeah, so we have Lady Audley's maid, who I guess is now going to blackmail her, and all right. I get that, girl. It's not good, but if I were a Victorian era servant and marrying my cousin who kind of seems like an asshole, I also might steal a baby shoe so I could open a bar.
![]() |
Our society's one constant |
HOW DO WE FEEL ABOUT MEB'S WRITING OF LADIES? And have you read her Wikipedia page? Because not only was she a scandalous actress who wrote a zillion novels, but she lived with a guy whose wife was in an asylum and founded a magazine and hm, I do not know what to make of you, Braddon.
P.S. My mind is way too in the gutter to deal with that proposal scene. I just...nope.
↧
"Do the Backstreet Boys count as a band?": Growing up bandless
"Everyone has blind spots," goes an extremely accurate quote from The IT Crowd.
Growing up, I not only didn't hear music like The Beatles and...other groups I don't even know the names of, because non-musical theatre music is beyond my abilities, but I don't remember hearing any bands at all. All my knowledge of what was popular at the time came from the Wayne's World series (particularly the second since it has that concert where people seemed to be really excited about this band Aerosmith), and from my oldest brother. He had all the CDs. I didn't listen to them, but I knew names like Pearl Jam, En Vogue, Salt-n-Pepa, Blues Traveler, and R.E.M. because of him. He gave me my first CD — a discarded Janet Jackson single of his called "If" which has FILTHY lyrics that you fortunately can't understand at all. Fortunately because I was eight and it became my favorite song.
This lack of knowledge came about because growing up, my mother would play musical theatre tapes. All the time. My brothers still know all the songs from The King and I, however much they might want to forget them. A few years ago, I said "Your servant, your servant/Indeed I'm not your servant" and my middle brother, against his very will answered "Although you give me less than servant's pay." This is what we grew up with. Well, this and the Time Life Fabulous Fifties collection, so we're also very up on the lyrics to Sh-Boom.
Those surveys that would go around LiveJournal and email circles back in the early days of the internet would inevitably ask your favorite band, and I would invariably answer "Beverly Sills," because I liked NO BANDS. I felt it was cheating to name someone on my Now That's What I Call Music CD since I only knew that one song of theirs that was super-popular.
My first exposure to the world outside musical theatre and opera came from VH1's Top Ten Countdown, where VH1 would play the music videos for the top 10 songs of the week. I watched it every time it aired, because My Heart Will Go On was in the top ten, and say what you will about Titanic, but I. LOVE. that song. I love it so much that as I was writing this, I had to listen to it again and stopped to lipsync to the part (you know which one) where it's all *silence* BOOM "YOOOU'RE HEEEERE/THERE'S NOOOOTHIIIING I FEAR." Like you can just let that happen with no participation.
The other songs in the top 10 at the time were stellar bastions of 1998 culture. Oh, let me tell you a tale of old and bring to mind such classics as Matchbox 20's 3 AM, Together Again by Janet Jackson, Savage Garden's Truly Madly Deeply, SMASH MOUTH and Walkin On the Sun, Madonna's Frozen, Natalie Imbruglia wailing the anemic voice of the late '90s girl in Torn, Lisa Loeb bringing in cool nerd girl in I Do, Sugar Ray's Fly which sounds like nothing if not the late '90s in musical form, and of course, the completely stupid Are You Jimmy Ray.
I am only now, with the advent of Spotify (the app I love more than all other apps), listening to bands. Bands everyone else just kind of seems to know. I still don't like The Beatles, mainly because I didn't have a teenage love of them and so now I'm just annoyed by how much everyone seems to like them and hold them above all other bands when they just have some catchy songs and yeah, Let It Be is real damn great, but so is Britney Spears's Where Are You Now.
I'm learning about this "The Clash" and Peter, Paul and Mary, and I will eventually have an opinion on Radiohead. I cannot currently name any of their songs, but it'll happen eventually. People keep making me playlists, so...hope springs eternal.
And at least I don't have to ask people if boy bands count as bands anymore.
Growing up, I not only didn't hear music like The Beatles and...other groups I don't even know the names of, because non-musical theatre music is beyond my abilities, but I don't remember hearing any bands at all. All my knowledge of what was popular at the time came from the Wayne's World series (particularly the second since it has that concert where people seemed to be really excited about this band Aerosmith), and from my oldest brother. He had all the CDs. I didn't listen to them, but I knew names like Pearl Jam, En Vogue, Salt-n-Pepa, Blues Traveler, and R.E.M. because of him. He gave me my first CD — a discarded Janet Jackson single of his called "If" which has FILTHY lyrics that you fortunately can't understand at all. Fortunately because I was eight and it became my favorite song.
![]() |
I still have no idea what's going on in the music video |
This lack of knowledge came about because growing up, my mother would play musical theatre tapes. All the time. My brothers still know all the songs from The King and I, however much they might want to forget them. A few years ago, I said "Your servant, your servant/Indeed I'm not your servant" and my middle brother, against his very will answered "Although you give me less than servant's pay." This is what we grew up with. Well, this and the Time Life Fabulous Fifties collection, so we're also very up on the lyrics to Sh-Boom.
Those surveys that would go around LiveJournal and email circles back in the early days of the internet would inevitably ask your favorite band, and I would invariably answer "Beverly Sills," because I liked NO BANDS. I felt it was cheating to name someone on my Now That's What I Call Music CD since I only knew that one song of theirs that was super-popular.
![]() |
The way you could get music-judged in the late '90s |
My first exposure to the world outside musical theatre and opera came from VH1's Top Ten Countdown, where VH1 would play the music videos for the top 10 songs of the week. I watched it every time it aired, because My Heart Will Go On was in the top ten, and say what you will about Titanic, but I. LOVE. that song. I love it so much that as I was writing this, I had to listen to it again and stopped to lipsync to the part (you know which one) where it's all *silence* BOOM "YOOOU'RE HEEEERE/THERE'S NOOOOTHIIIING I FEAR." Like you can just let that happen with no participation.
The other songs in the top 10 at the time were stellar bastions of 1998 culture. Oh, let me tell you a tale of old and bring to mind such classics as Matchbox 20's 3 AM, Together Again by Janet Jackson, Savage Garden's Truly Madly Deeply, SMASH MOUTH and Walkin On the Sun, Madonna's Frozen, Natalie Imbruglia wailing the anemic voice of the late '90s girl in Torn, Lisa Loeb bringing in cool nerd girl in I Do, Sugar Ray's Fly which sounds like nothing if not the late '90s in musical form, and of course, the completely stupid Are You Jimmy Ray.
![]() |
No, but seriously, I love Lisa Loeb |
I am only now, with the advent of Spotify (the app I love more than all other apps), listening to bands. Bands everyone else just kind of seems to know. I still don't like The Beatles, mainly because I didn't have a teenage love of them and so now I'm just annoyed by how much everyone seems to like them and hold them above all other bands when they just have some catchy songs and yeah, Let It Be is real damn great, but so is Britney Spears's Where Are You Now.
I'm learning about this "The Clash" and Peter, Paul and Mary, and I will eventually have an opinion on Radiohead. I cannot currently name any of their songs, but it'll happen eventually. People keep making me playlists, so...hope springs eternal.
And at least I don't have to ask people if boy bands count as bands anymore.
↧
Game of Thrones: Direwolf Puppies and Plot Twists Are Apparently the Way to Hold an Audience
Game of Thrones the book (unclear about the show) is amazing. Let's recap why.
A MILLION FAMILIES. Fighting for the throne. I think there're actually like four as of right now, but if gifsets on tumblr have taught me anything, it will soon turn into a million.
CHANGING PERSPECTIVES. Wilkie Collins started it and George R. R. Martin is going to finish it. By creating a serum that allows him to outlive the last man on Earth and therefore ensure that no one will ever be able to read his complete series. Such seems to be his plan. But changing perspectives of characters is a similar device to short chapters re keeping the reader's interest. Don't like what's going on? Wait 20 pages and your ENTIRE LANDSCAPE shall change. Good one, GRRM.
DIREWOLVES. No one in their right mind would refuse a direwolf. Well. Maybe if a direwolf had killed your parents. And as you were lying there, weeping over their direwolf-mauled bodies you yelled "IF THERE IS ONE THING I SHALL NEVER DO, IT IS HAVE A PET DIREWOLF." But that is pretty much the only situation I can imagine, because direwolves are all about YOU. Everyone wants one because it's like "Hey, what if you had a bodyguard who couldn't be bribed and everyone was afraid of it because it could rip your arm off? But also it's kind of cute."
SIDE PICKING. "Oh, you like the Greyjoys? Well FUCK YOU, Stannis Baratheon 4EVS." Side picking is the funnest and it's one of the main reasons professional sports are a thing. So this is like that, only at the end it's who rules the known world and not who gets to have their name engraved on a plaque or...whatever you get in sports. One of the best parts of Game of Thrones is that almost no one is just bad, so everything is shades of grey and you get to pick the side you personally like. My middle brother 100% would be pro-Stark. I suspect I will like Asha Greyjoy, solely because of this:
So what's the first book in broad strokes? There's Current King. His best friend is the head of the North or something. That's the Stark family. The head of the North has a bunch of kids and they all get direwolves which might be a prophecy or something, no one knows, but the direwolves are cool so we don't care. Current King is married to a lady whose family is head of the West. They're all jerks, but there's a dwarf named Tyrion and everyone who reads the books seems to love him but he's kind of an asshole. Then across the sea are the Targaryens, whose family was overthrown by Current King, and they have the dragon as their symbol and they're REALLY INTO DRAGONS. Except Danaerys Targaryen marries King of the Horses or something, and she wants to take back the throne with her dragon + horse powers.
There're a lot fewer boobs than in the show (thank God), and everything kind of goes to hell at the end of the first book (but in a FUN way), so then you read on to the second and the third and fourth and the fifth and OMG why are you so invested you don't even know but you feel like it's okay because everyone else is too.
The one thing I can't do is ship people, because everything feels so unstable. Whenever I ask my GRRM-wise friend Katie-Anne if I can ship a pairing, her response is basically "Erm...I maybe wouldn't do that." Which probably means one person eventually kills the other one's grandmother in some horrific way and makes them watch. I'll find a ship, Game of Thrones. You won't keep me from this.
A MILLION FAMILIES. Fighting for the throne. I think there're actually like four as of right now, but if gifsets on tumblr have taught me anything, it will soon turn into a million.
CHANGING PERSPECTIVES. Wilkie Collins started it and George R. R. Martin is going to finish it. By creating a serum that allows him to outlive the last man on Earth and therefore ensure that no one will ever be able to read his complete series. Such seems to be his plan. But changing perspectives of characters is a similar device to short chapters re keeping the reader's interest. Don't like what's going on? Wait 20 pages and your ENTIRE LANDSCAPE shall change. Good one, GRRM.
DIREWOLVES. No one in their right mind would refuse a direwolf. Well. Maybe if a direwolf had killed your parents. And as you were lying there, weeping over their direwolf-mauled bodies you yelled "IF THERE IS ONE THING I SHALL NEVER DO, IT IS HAVE A PET DIREWOLF." But that is pretty much the only situation I can imagine, because direwolves are all about YOU. Everyone wants one because it's like "Hey, what if you had a bodyguard who couldn't be bribed and everyone was afraid of it because it could rip your arm off? But also it's kind of cute."
![]() |
And in that moment, we were all Jon Snow |
SIDE PICKING. "Oh, you like the Greyjoys? Well FUCK YOU, Stannis Baratheon 4EVS." Side picking is the funnest and it's one of the main reasons professional sports are a thing. So this is like that, only at the end it's who rules the known world and not who gets to have their name engraved on a plaque or...whatever you get in sports. One of the best parts of Game of Thrones is that almost no one is just bad, so everything is shades of grey and you get to pick the side you personally like. My middle brother 100% would be pro-Stark. I suspect I will like Asha Greyjoy, solely because of this:
So what's the first book in broad strokes? There's Current King. His best friend is the head of the North or something. That's the Stark family. The head of the North has a bunch of kids and they all get direwolves which might be a prophecy or something, no one knows, but the direwolves are cool so we don't care. Current King is married to a lady whose family is head of the West. They're all jerks, but there's a dwarf named Tyrion and everyone who reads the books seems to love him but he's kind of an asshole. Then across the sea are the Targaryens, whose family was overthrown by Current King, and they have the dragon as their symbol and they're REALLY INTO DRAGONS. Except Danaerys Targaryen marries King of the Horses or something, and she wants to take back the throne with her dragon + horse powers.
There're a lot fewer boobs than in the show (thank God), and everything kind of goes to hell at the end of the first book (but in a FUN way), so then you read on to the second and the third and fourth and the fifth and OMG why are you so invested you don't even know but you feel like it's okay because everyone else is too.
The one thing I can't do is ship people, because everything feels so unstable. Whenever I ask my GRRM-wise friend Katie-Anne if I can ship a pairing, her response is basically "Erm...I maybe wouldn't do that." Which probably means one person eventually kills the other one's grandmother in some horrific way and makes them watch. I'll find a ship, Game of Thrones. You won't keep me from this.
↧
↧
"Alicia, don't be German!": Lady Audley's Big Secret Continues
MORE CLEWS.
So last week I was totally taken in by Helen Talboys being dead, and then you all were like "SHE'S TOTALLY NOT THOUGH" and now I'm slightly disappointed in Braddon, but willing to see how this plays out, because it's honestly seeming more and more soap opera-y every second.
I had to look up what filberts were (they are nuts!) and who Izaak Walton was (a fisherman!) but otherwise things seemed all right, comprehension-wise. Except for the fact that everyone in this book is COMPLETELY RIDICULOUS and it makes you realize what an amazing writer Dickens was, because damn, this is dated.
What the hell is going on with George and his son? Because I do not like it ONE BIT. He goes to Australia for the boy's entire life, comes back and then is all "Naw, he's fine with his grandfather; that seems like a good thing, that relationship with a drunken old man. Probably'll give the boy character." What are you doing, George. Think about your life. Think about your choices.
Lucy is avoiding George in SRSLY CLEVER WAYS. Like, I immediately would've been like "Nope, sorry, don't come by. No. No, I just don't want to see you or meet you or really just have you look at my face ever. No, I'm not telling you why." But instead she was all "Of COURSE you should come round tomorrow," and she had her maid MAIL A FAKE TELEGRAM, which...actually confused me, because then her husband went with her, so.....but it had to be fake. Because...yeah. Hm.
Anyway, Robert Audley's the only really great character so far, and I've told myself he's lazily in love with George, because we always gay up Victorian lit and he's the only possible candidate so far IMO. Some fantastic Robertisms:
"I feel like the hero of a French novel."
Robert Audley stared at his friend in silent amazement; and, after a pause of profound deliberation, said solemnly, "George Talboys, I could understand this if you had been eating heavy suppers. Cold pork, now, especially if underdone, might produce this sort of thing."
"Don't be German, Alicia, if you love me. The picture is— the picture: and my lady is— my lady. That's my way of taking things, and I'm not metaphysical; don't unsettle me."
So Robert and George go down to the country where Audley Court is, Lady Audley assiduously avoids them, everything speaks with foreboding and you're laying it on a little thick, Braddon. No more "the leaves rustled with that sinister, shivering motion which proceeds from no outer cause, but is rather an instinctive shudder of the frail branches, prescient of a coming storm."
I HATE the pathetic fallacy. It's not real and it's overused and MAYBE NOT so much in 1862, but you know what, Wuthering Heights was old by then, so yes, it was done. Stop it now. Ruskin defended its use a bit by saying it was not that nature was conforming itself to the viewer but that the viewer was seeing nature through the warped lens of their emotions (so in this case, the leaves were moving about a bit and George -- probably not Robert -- interpreted them as foreboding through...some means).
But that's it. It's not even the pathetic fallacy is in terms of like, "I'm sad and the clouds are weeping." It's saying that nature knows something our characters don't, which is b.s. and boooo.
What were we talking about? Oh right. Alicia Audley.
Let's stop making her seem quite so sad of a character, because she's described as looking WAY more attractive than Lucy, and she's smart and funny:
And you think, aw, family, but NO, she's in love with him and it's gross.
Next week! Was Lady Audley having a secret assignation with her probable first husband? Will Robert finally wake up enough to tell George he wouldn't mind if they were roommates forever? Will Alicia stop acting like a brat 24/7 (probably not). And how is there so much left of this novel? UNTIL NEXT WEEK, FRIENDS.
(P.S. totally forgot to mention that Phoebe looking like Lady Audley is going to be a THING, and piggybacking on Jenny's statement about someone being murdered in the well, MAYBE Phoebe'll be made up to look like Lady Audley and then murdered BY THAT SELFSAME WOMAN. maybe)
So last week I was totally taken in by Helen Talboys being dead, and then you all were like "SHE'S TOTALLY NOT THOUGH" and now I'm slightly disappointed in Braddon, but willing to see how this plays out, because it's honestly seeming more and more soap opera-y every second.
![]() |
Again, not that that's a bad thing |
I had to look up what filberts were (they are nuts!) and who Izaak Walton was (a fisherman!) but otherwise things seemed all right, comprehension-wise. Except for the fact that everyone in this book is COMPLETELY RIDICULOUS and it makes you realize what an amazing writer Dickens was, because damn, this is dated.
What the hell is going on with George and his son? Because I do not like it ONE BIT. He goes to Australia for the boy's entire life, comes back and then is all "Naw, he's fine with his grandfather; that seems like a good thing, that relationship with a drunken old man. Probably'll give the boy character." What are you doing, George. Think about your life. Think about your choices.
![]() |
Oh right, again...not Dickens. |
Lucy is avoiding George in SRSLY CLEVER WAYS. Like, I immediately would've been like "Nope, sorry, don't come by. No. No, I just don't want to see you or meet you or really just have you look at my face ever. No, I'm not telling you why." But instead she was all "Of COURSE you should come round tomorrow," and she had her maid MAIL A FAKE TELEGRAM, which...actually confused me, because then her husband went with her, so.....but it had to be fake. Because...yeah. Hm.
Anyway, Robert Audley's the only really great character so far, and I've told myself he's lazily in love with George, because we always gay up Victorian lit and he's the only possible candidate so far IMO. Some fantastic Robertisms:
"I feel like the hero of a French novel."
Robert Audley stared at his friend in silent amazement; and, after a pause of profound deliberation, said solemnly, "George Talboys, I could understand this if you had been eating heavy suppers. Cold pork, now, especially if underdone, might produce this sort of thing."
"Don't be German, Alicia, if you love me. The picture is— the picture: and my lady is— my lady. That's my way of taking things, and I'm not metaphysical; don't unsettle me."
So Robert and George go down to the country where Audley Court is, Lady Audley assiduously avoids them, everything speaks with foreboding and you're laying it on a little thick, Braddon. No more "the leaves rustled with that sinister, shivering motion which proceeds from no outer cause, but is rather an instinctive shudder of the frail branches, prescient of a coming storm."
I HATE the pathetic fallacy. It's not real and it's overused and MAYBE NOT so much in 1862, but you know what, Wuthering Heights was old by then, so yes, it was done. Stop it now. Ruskin defended its use a bit by saying it was not that nature was conforming itself to the viewer but that the viewer was seeing nature through the warped lens of their emotions (so in this case, the leaves were moving about a bit and George -- probably not Robert -- interpreted them as foreboding through...some means).
But that's it. It's not even the pathetic fallacy is in terms of like, "I'm sad and the clouds are weeping." It's saying that nature knows something our characters don't, which is b.s. and boooo.
![]() |
the pathetic fallacy: where man and nature meet |
What were we talking about? Oh right. Alicia Audley.
Let's stop making her seem quite so sad of a character, because she's described as looking WAY more attractive than Lucy, and she's smart and funny:
"MY DEAR ROBERT— How cruel of you to run away to that horrid St. Petersburg before the hunting season! I have heard that people lose their noses in that disagreeable climate, and as yours is rather a long one, I should advise you to return before the very severe weather sets in.But she's just pining after her cousin — AGAIN WITH THE COUSIN LOVE VICTORIANS YOU ARE THE WORST. And everyone's acting like they can ONLY marry their cousin! So we've got Phoebe Marks with her asshole cousin who I guess she's decided is the one guy for her, and then Alicia says: "To have only one cousin in the world, my nearest relation after papa, and for him to care about as much for me as he would for a dog!"
And you think, aw, family, but NO, she's in love with him and it's gross.
![]() |
Don't you know what happens in these situations? |
Next week! Was Lady Audley having a secret assignation with her probable first husband? Will Robert finally wake up enough to tell George he wouldn't mind if they were roommates forever? Will Alicia stop acting like a brat 24/7 (probably not). And how is there so much left of this novel? UNTIL NEXT WEEK, FRIENDS.
(P.S. totally forgot to mention that Phoebe looking like Lady Audley is going to be a THING, and piggybacking on Jenny's statement about someone being murdered in the well, MAYBE Phoebe'll be made up to look like Lady Audley and then murdered BY THAT SELFSAME WOMAN. maybe)
↧
Syndrome E: "What sort of animal had be become in the jungles of Colombia?" and other fun phrases
The good folks at Penguin asked if I wanted to review a book called Syndrome E by Franck Thilliez. As Penguin is a fine publisher, I checked it out, and it turns out it's a thriller that did EXCEPTIONALLY WELL in France. Plus the concept -- people being killed and it being linked to cinema -- seemed worth reading.
I usually avoid translated works. I took a translation theory class in college, and the main thing I took away from it was you can never perfectly translate something. The same words carry different weight in different languages. What if I wrote something and called a person a tool? (as I am wont to do) German probably has a rough equivalent, but it's not going to have all the cultural things attached to it that tool was. When we hear a word, we have the weight of our society's history linked with it. So will you be reading the exact same thing in translation that people read in its original language? No. But you can get a pretty decent approximation.
![]() |
Sometimes the translation just gets...lost (JOKE TIME) |
Books like this (thrillers, lighter reading), I don't have so much a problem with, because I assume the writer wasn't choosing their words with QUITE as much care as, say, Borges. Maybe.
![]() |
WHO KNOWS |
The main characters are with the French police, and named Lucie Hennebelle and Franck Sharko. Bodies have been discovered! With their brains and eyes removed! And a man just watched a super-rare unlabeled film that has left him BLIND. How are they connected? I do hope we go on a rollercoaster ride through the streets of France, Cairo and Montreal (we do).
It has some cute translational/cultural things, like referring to one character as having spent some time "in Washington," and I totally thought they meant the state until later it became clear they were in fact referring to Washington DC. And one character has what she terms "a revolting lunch" which consists of "a slab of overcooked meat with no sauce and boiled potatoes." NO SAUCE. #france
One of the ADVANTAGES of reading literature from other nations is that you do see things from the cliched-but-not-often-explored alternate perspective. There're things I am genuinely unsure about, like if all French people would understand a line like "[it] looked like something out of Egyptian films from the forties." Oh, of course, THOSE films. The American film industry dominates the market so much, I usually pat myself on the back for watching ANY foreign film. If you read books from cultures other than your own, you realize the things you thought "everybody" knew are different in different countries. And that's probably one of those important steps down the road of Becoming Less of an Entitled Jag.
![]() |
I googled "entitled jag" and this popped up |
I like books like this. I like murders and conspiracies and lots of little pieces that seem WHOLLY UNCONNECTED until bam! They're all sewn neatly together. This requires so much planning/thinking ahead on the part of the author, and maybe your brain works that way, but mine does not. Strategy games? Hell no, give me the game of Life. Spin the wheel, move your little car, become a rockstar and buy a split-level house. That's about what I can handle. Not this "I'm going to think 15 moves ahead," which you have to do when you write this kind of book. And it is DELIGHTFUL being in someone's brain when they are able to think like that. It's why Sherlock Holmes is still kicking.
So, Syndrome E. Get it, read it, find out why the man went blind. Maybe make fun of the French a bit while you're reading it.
![]() |
This is all you guys do, right? |
And -- GIVEAWAY. Penguin said (U.S. only, I am SORRY and gnash my teeth on your behalf, Other Nations) I could give away a copy to one of y'all, so if you want to read this fast-paced French thriller that came out last week, tell me in the comments, yo. I'll pick someone on Monday through a raaandomizer.
↧
Mostly Consisting of Television Reactions
On occasion, we of the human race have nights where DESPITE the knowledge that we shall be sleep-addled lunatic zombies in the morning, we find ourselves wide awake and needing to watch some YouTube vids (probably Emma Stone interviews, because that girl sparkles).
I took the day off from work yesterday, and thus it was a day of auditioning, library visits, pancake-eating, and Luther-watching. Which ended roundabout 1:30 AM. THIS BEING THE CASE, I have some strong television opinions I will now be sharing.
The OUAT season 3 finale has happened. And all I can say is
It was a flaming pile of fail, and for something (acknowledged by me and many others who watch it as Not a Good Show) that one's invested so much energy in to act THAT way, it's like if you told everyone how much you love this one kind of soup. And how awesome the soup is and you're really looking forward to eating it. And you go to the restaurant and the chef makes the soup and brings it out, but then spits in it to show you he hates you and then throws it against the wall while laughing.
That's what the Once Upon a Time finale was like.
Jenny messaged me last week to tell me to watch Penny Dreadful, not FIVE MINUTES after I'd seen a Tumblr gifset of it that I very much enjoyed. Eva Green! Helen McCrory! Victorian England! And who doesn't love a Timothy Dalton full of gravitas and wearing a gentlemanly hat.
The first episode is free to watch on Showtime's website, and I consider it excellent. Really, really graphic, but a graphic I could handle. And bonus, first episode had no ladyboobs, but totally had dudes' business out there for all the world to see. I applaud you, show. Level the playing field, as it were.
The plot is basically "Let's take monsters from late Victorian literature and put them in a show that has a deeper message about people accepting their true selves." And apparently they want me to ship Eva Green with Dorian Gray, which I have no problem doing.
And then there's Luther, which I've been hearing about since I regularly posted on LiveJournal, and which my roommate and I watched four episodes of last night. Luther/Alice, I am fond of you.
So I'll just be over here, recovering from my Swan Queen feels and comparing them to Harry/Draco in my head (THE PARALLELS ARE THERE). Now excuse me as I weep in a corner.
I took the day off from work yesterday, and thus it was a day of auditioning, library visits, pancake-eating, and Luther-watching. Which ended roundabout 1:30 AM. THIS BEING THE CASE, I have some strong television opinions I will now be sharing.
The OUAT season 3 finale has happened. And all I can say is
It was a flaming pile of fail, and for something (acknowledged by me and many others who watch it as Not a Good Show) that one's invested so much energy in to act THAT way, it's like if you told everyone how much you love this one kind of soup. And how awesome the soup is and you're really looking forward to eating it. And you go to the restaurant and the chef makes the soup and brings it out, but then spits in it to show you he hates you and then throws it against the wall while laughing.
That's what the Once Upon a Time finale was like.
Jenny messaged me last week to tell me to watch Penny Dreadful, not FIVE MINUTES after I'd seen a Tumblr gifset of it that I very much enjoyed. Eva Green! Helen McCrory! Victorian England! And who doesn't love a Timothy Dalton full of gravitas and wearing a gentlemanly hat.
The first episode is free to watch on Showtime's website, and I consider it excellent. Really, really graphic, but a graphic I could handle. And bonus, first episode had no ladyboobs, but totally had dudes' business out there for all the world to see. I applaud you, show. Level the playing field, as it were.
The plot is basically "Let's take monsters from late Victorian literature and put them in a show that has a deeper message about people accepting their true selves." And apparently they want me to ship Eva Green with Dorian Gray, which I have no problem doing.
![]() |
Yes, you are both sufficiently attractive |
And then there's Luther, which I've been hearing about since I regularly posted on LiveJournal, and which my roommate and I watched four episodes of last night. Luther/Alice, I am fond of you.
![]() |
I thought this show was a comedy until I watched it and nooooo, it is not a comedy |
So I'll just be over here, recovering from my Swan Queen feels and comparing them to Harry/Draco in my head (THE PARALLELS ARE THERE). Now excuse me as I weep in a corner.
↧
Nancy Mitford's Pigeon Pie: More Nazis and Some Retrospective Awkwardness
If you will remember, Nancy Mitford's first novel, Wigs on the Green was about Nazis, but 1935 Nazis when people were all "What-ho, this Hitler chap seems maybe not the best, but it's not as if he's committing genocide against his own countrymen and trying to take over the world."
CUT TO 1940, when Pigeon Pie was published (Mitford had published no novels in the interim). War had been declared, but no one (or at least not Nancy Mitford) was taking it seriously:
*mutters* "Saved YOUR ass."
Pigeon Pie concerns a will-o-the-wisp socialite who's trying to stay entertained in the midst of this war outbreak. She volunteers at an emergency medical post, but they just do drills since nothing has really happened yet. The London Blitz wasn't until fall of 1940, so the publication of this was undoubtedly ill-timed since the whole war is portrayed primarily as a nuisance.
There're obvious Secret Spy Shenanigans happening around her, but as she's something of a female Bertie Wooster, only the reader notices them. Mysterious birds flying around the house? A furiously winking and gagged servant being carried out on a stretcher? And where has her uncle, the world's greatest singer, disappeared to and why is his wig found on the green when that was the title of the OTHER book.
I'm left in something of a confounded state by Mitford's writing, because I like it to the extent that it makes me want to hang out with her at a party. I'm planning on reading all her books, not because they're my absolute favorite, but because she provides a very unique view. You didn't often have women, especially upper class women, writing novels around World War II and giving a glimpse into her class's sentiments about that time.
The sentiments, again, seem to be that no one seemed very worried until late 1940.
Mitford's books are popular enough that they're always checked out of the library, and they keep being reprinted. But I'd be hard-pressed to find any of my friends having read them. It seems you need to be into Wodehouse-type literature, England in the 1930s & '40s, and find the quietly funny English novel of that period a rip-roaring good time to be a Mitford fan. I'm finding myself in an uncomfortable middle ground on all those points, but it's enough to have bought Love in a Cold Climate the last time I was drunk at a bookstore (i.e. last week). Let's see if you improve when you're not airily dismissing Nazis, Mitford.
![]() |
"I see no problem here." |
CUT TO 1940, when Pigeon Pie was published (Mitford had published no novels in the interim). War had been declared, but no one (or at least not Nancy Mitford) was taking it seriously:
Rather soon after the war had been declared, it became obvious that nobody intended it to begin. The belligerent countries were behaving like children in a round game, picking up sides, and until the sides had been picked up the game could not start[...] America, of course, was too much of a baby for such a grown-up game, but she was just longing to see it played.
*mutters* "Saved YOUR ass."
Pigeon Pie concerns a will-o-the-wisp socialite who's trying to stay entertained in the midst of this war outbreak. She volunteers at an emergency medical post, but they just do drills since nothing has really happened yet. The London Blitz wasn't until fall of 1940, so the publication of this was undoubtedly ill-timed since the whole war is portrayed primarily as a nuisance.
There're obvious Secret Spy Shenanigans happening around her, but as she's something of a female Bertie Wooster, only the reader notices them. Mysterious birds flying around the house? A furiously winking and gagged servant being carried out on a stretcher? And where has her uncle, the world's greatest singer, disappeared to and why is his wig found on the green when that was the title of the OTHER book.
I'm left in something of a confounded state by Mitford's writing, because I like it to the extent that it makes me want to hang out with her at a party. I'm planning on reading all her books, not because they're my absolute favorite, but because she provides a very unique view. You didn't often have women, especially upper class women, writing novels around World War II and giving a glimpse into her class's sentiments about that time.
The sentiments, again, seem to be that no one seemed very worried until late 1940.
"Of course I don't want to say I told you so, darling, but there's never been a pin to put between the Communists and the Nazis. The Communists torture you to death if you're not a worker, and the Nazis torture you to death if you're not a German. If you are they look at your nose first. Aristocrats are inclined to prefer Nazis while Jews prefer Bolshies."
Mitford's books are popular enough that they're always checked out of the library, and they keep being reprinted. But I'd be hard-pressed to find any of my friends having read them. It seems you need to be into Wodehouse-type literature, England in the 1930s & '40s, and find the quietly funny English novel of that period a rip-roaring good time to be a Mitford fan. I'm finding myself in an uncomfortable middle ground on all those points, but it's enough to have bought Love in a Cold Climate the last time I was drunk at a bookstore (i.e. last week). Let's see if you improve when you're not airily dismissing Nazis, Mitford.
↧
↧
Lady Audley's Really Big Secret: The Story of One Man and His Romantic Quest of Love
The book is pretty damn clear about Lady Audley and what she's done, but we have TWO HUNDRED PAGES LEFT. What else shall happen!
We're just gonna lead with "prancing tits" because WHAT? Knacker's yard? Go home, Mary Elizabeth Braddon, you are drunk.
Ok, I have done some reading on the World Wide Web, and apparently a knacker is someone you'd bring your old sad tired horse to, and you'd be like "HE'S ALL USED UP" and the knacker'd say "Okay dokey" and "render" your horse. Damn. That was a job that people would have to do.
Searching "prancing tits" yields up exactly what you'd expect, and also resulted in me following the Tumblr Unintentionally Dirty. But upon further seeking-out, I discovered that it was slang for "a worthless or worn-out horse." So really this whole section is about being abysmal to horses.
Alicia's horse is named Atalanta. Do we need to re-read the story of Atalanta? (tldr: Greek lady who was awesome at footraces but got tricked by apples; did something naughty in a temple)
Sometimes history forgets things which it ABSOLUTELY should not. Lady Audley refers to a "Bamfyld Moore Carew" who apparently was actually "Bampfylde" and if you do not read his Wikipedia page, I give up all hope for you and your interest in gathering the riches of this world into your brain. My favorite part about "the Noted Devonshire Stroller and Dogstealer"? That he's holding a dog in his portrait. "WHAT UP WORLD, JUST GONNA FLAUNT MY DOG THIEVERY."
I'm not sure what it means that I'm more interested in the pop culture references in this book than the actual story. Well. Aside from the story of Robert being totally gayballs for George. Alicia, he's making strides in his brain towards you, but only because of society.
I love them. I want them to get married and adopt some dogs and take George's son to the zoo.
We're just gonna lead with "prancing tits" because WHAT? Knacker's yard? Go home, Mary Elizabeth Braddon, you are drunk.
Ok, I have done some reading on the World Wide Web, and apparently a knacker is someone you'd bring your old sad tired horse to, and you'd be like "HE'S ALL USED UP" and the knacker'd say "Okay dokey" and "render" your horse. Damn. That was a job that people would have to do.
Searching "prancing tits" yields up exactly what you'd expect, and also resulted in me following the Tumblr Unintentionally Dirty. But upon further seeking-out, I discovered that it was slang for "a worthless or worn-out horse." So really this whole section is about being abysmal to horses.
Alicia's horse is named Atalanta. Do we need to re-read the story of Atalanta? (tldr: Greek lady who was awesome at footraces but got tricked by apples; did something naughty in a temple)
Sometimes history forgets things which it ABSOLUTELY should not. Lady Audley refers to a "Bamfyld Moore Carew" who apparently was actually "Bampfylde" and if you do not read his Wikipedia page, I give up all hope for you and your interest in gathering the riches of this world into your brain. My favorite part about "the Noted Devonshire Stroller and Dogstealer"? That he's holding a dog in his portrait. "WHAT UP WORLD, JUST GONNA FLAUNT MY DOG THIEVERY."
I'm not sure what it means that I'm more interested in the pop culture references in this book than the actual story. Well. Aside from the story of Robert being totally gayballs for George. Alicia, he's making strides in his brain towards you, but only because of society.
Still my lady's pretty musical prattle ran on as merrily and continuously as the babble in some brook; and still Robert's thoughts wandered, in spite of himself, to George Talboys.
"To think," he said, meditatively, "that it is possible to care so much for a fellow! But come what may, I'll go up to town after him the first thing to-morrow morning; and, sooner than be balked in finding him, I'll go to the very end of the world."
I love them. I want them to get married and adopt some dogs and take George's son to the zoo.
↧
Zombie Spaceship Wasteland: "We were, postage-wise, suburban feudal subjects."
I gave Patton Oswalt's book Zombie Spaceship Wasteland 3 out of 5 stars on Goodreads but you should still read it, and I shall tell you why.
I love Patton Oswalt. A lot. Stand-up comics have occupied a disproportionate section of my brain since I was 12 and Comedy Central Presents appeared, and with the advent of Spotify, you can hear all their albums without spending a ton of money (however, if they're doing the brilliant 'give me $5 for my album' thing that Louis C.K. started, DO IT, because most comedians are not J.P. Morgan -- in fact, he probably wasn't funny at all). I saw Patton Oswalt (from here on referred to simply as 'Patton' because 'Oswalt' sounds so cold, and also I want to pretend we're friends) on shows like Reno 911, but I hadn't heard his stand-up until recently and therefore I only realized a year ago that he. is. so smart.
He wavers between this intellectually elite, could-talk-circles-around-his-audience vibe, to ridiculously crass, "here's what you guys want, but I also just talk this way sometimes" levels of humor. When mocking his "Physics for Poets" class in college that he had to take as an English major, he describes it as "where the students would ask questions like 'Is the red planet Mercury like the crimson eye of Cerebus?'"
So the book of this funny, frustrated, brilliant, nerdy man. It's short. It's around 190 pages. On one level, I'm glad his publisher seems to have just let him do whatever he wanted with it. Sometimes comedians need to just experiment and throw all their shit out there, and some of it turns out to be the Next Level of Comedy, but some...does not work. Because the essay-style was so all over the place, it felt kind of wandery and 'Wait...what's happening now'ish.
THAT BEING SAID. I'm still keeping it so I can read it again. His essay about working in a movie theater as a teenager in his small town? Fantastic. His story about working in the worst town in Canada (nay, in perhaps the world)? COMPELLING STUFF. And the awesome thing about comedy is that maybe you'll love all the stuff I was like "Meh, didn't really work for me" about. You know what I find hilarious every time I see it, and which NO ONE ELSE has ever laughed at with me? The moment in Big when Elizabeth Perkins's character is trying to make Tom Hanks hit on her and she finally just says "I'M REALLY VULNERABLE RIGHT NOW." So you never know with comedy.
What I do know is that Patton is smart and thoughtful and a giant nerd. OH, and he has an essay in his book about Dungeons and Dragons that cleared up a lot of questions for me.
Also how do you not read something with this as the author pic? |
For those of you with Spotify: Patton Oswalt. My Weakness Is Strong. The track "Rats." Worth it.
↧
Lady Audley's Giantly Hidden Secret Readalong: "Is it *me* the flying female wants?"
We read more and SO much happened. By which I mean Robert got booted from Audley Court because Lady Audley didn't want him SNOOPING, he moved to Phoebe the Albino and Her Abusive Cousin-Husband's public house, he chased Lady Audley to London which she then departed from looking VERY SMUG INDEED, then he dropped Smaller George at a boarding school and fell in love with a girl who is of course totally not the socially acceptable version of her brother.
Oh, Victorian Age and siblings and the weird literary sexual issues pertaining to both. This subject was my JAM last year when I was determined to prove Helena Landless and Rosa Bud would, if Edwin Drood were ever finished, be opening a vegan bakery together, if you know what I mean. Despite lines like
Dickens put all the directly-stated desire for Rosa onto Neville, Helena's twin. Not ok for the two people you're talking about to venture into the realm of open-mouth kissing? Stick one of them with the other's brother or sister and you're a-okay.
Some Things:
1) "Justice to the dead first," he said; "mercy to the living afterward."
2) Every now and then, Braddon sneaks in some really good writing, and I'm all surprised because I thought she wasn't done bashing us over the head with how pale Phoebe Marks is.
![]() |
I don't think you would even say that, Robert |
Oh, Victorian Age and siblings and the weird literary sexual issues pertaining to both. This subject was my JAM last year when I was determined to prove Helena Landless and Rosa Bud would, if Edwin Drood were ever finished, be opening a vegan bakery together, if you know what I mean. Despite lines like
'I can answer for you,' laughed Helena, searching the lovely little face with her dark, fiery eyes, and tenderly caressing the small figure. 'You will be a friend to me, won't you?'
Dickens put all the directly-stated desire for Rosa onto Neville, Helena's twin. Not ok for the two people you're talking about to venture into the realm of open-mouth kissing? Stick one of them with the other's brother or sister and you're a-okay.
Some Things:
1) "Justice to the dead first," he said; "mercy to the living afterward."
![]() |
Robert Audley is a BAMF |
2) Every now and then, Braddon sneaks in some really good writing, and I'm all surprised because I thought she wasn't done bashing us over the head with how pale Phoebe Marks is.
There were no shady nooks in his character into which one could creep for shelter from his hard daylight. He was all daylight. He looked at everything in the same broad glare of intellectual sunlight, and would see no softening shadows that might alter the sharp outlines of cruel facts, subduing them to beauty.
I actually take that back a little, because she'll have these glimmers of really good writing, but then be like "WAIT LET ME SAY IT AGAIN. Did you get it that time? I don't think you did." And it makes me sad, because we need more awesome lady novelists. Also because she actually seems like a really hilarious person and if I ever get to time travel and run into her, I'd like to honestly admire her writing while we split some eel in a tavern (ugh, England, you're gross).
3) If afternoon isn't at 3 o'clock, when is it?
Very excited about Robert and Clara. Shipping it. Shipping it hard. "Her beauty was elevated into sublimity by the intensity of her suppressed passion" INDEED.
↧
Books What I Love a Lot
Since the ever-delightful Meghan at Little, Brown basically turned me into a bashful hedgehog, I'm going to go hide under a daffodil, but first mention some books I love. Aside from Game of Thrones. Because I'm now mired in book 2 and not prancing about in gleeful abandon, singing its praises, SO.
So the deal with Auntie Mame is that it's as great as finding a tub of toasted marshmallows and tiny kittens. Only I guess more sanitary. Whatever I'd still eat those marshmallows.
It's a book about an older, rich woman, narrated by her nephew Patrick. The whole book's written in episodes, which is the best because then you can flip back to your favorites, like when Auntie Mame visits Patrick's uber-WASP girlfriend and her parents at their summer home and everything is the worst but then Mame says All the Things to them and suddenly everything is sunshine and diamonds.
The movie with Rosalind Russell is stellar. And I think I saw it before I read the book. You should do both. And then read Around the World with Auntie Mame. And then weep, for there are no more Mame books to conquer.
Every time I find a stand-out book, I feel so much RELIEF, because I can answer the 'What's your favorite book?' question (which I've actually noticed gets asked less as an adult). When I was 10, it was Gone-Away Lake, which I had with this cover here and which I BELIEVE I got from Scholastic book orders.
Gone-Away Lake is about two cousins who're at some summer home and go wandering off through a swamp (my memory for this plot is 15 years old, so...) and happen upon a bunch of dilapidated but formerly grand turn-of-the-century houses, and two old residents, Minnie and Pindar.
I love books with backstory and detail, and Gone-Away Lake is pretty much Minnie and Pindar telling stories about the people who used to live in the now-falling-apart mansions. I'm also 90% this is the book that taught me what a philosopher's stone is. Elizabeth Enright, marry me.
Remember Diana Victrix? No? Ok, well, it's a New Woman novel written by a Wellesley grad in 1897, where the two ladies decide not to get married to gentlemen, because they do not love them, and instead they live together forever and preach about socialism.
IT IS THE GREATEST. And one of the main characters is described as "Enid was tall and broad and strong; her skin was smooth; her flesh was firm; her eyes were brown and clear, with golden lights in them, like the lights in her hair."
Yesssss tell me more of Enid.
Books like this bring me immense joy, because when you sit down and think about the canon, you start realizing it's partly bullshit, because do you know what how much political ridiculousness a novel has to go through to get approved and taught and there are SO MANY excellent works that have fallen through the cracks of Time because not enough school board members decided they were representative of the values they wished to promote. I STRONGLY ENCOURAGE YOU to try to root out at least one or two non-famous books a year.
When people have asked me for recommendations (which I am hilariously bad at, by the way, because I just want to make everyone read the above), I've found myself leaning towards: The Sisters Brothers, Tell the Wolves I'm Home, The Invention of Wings, Orange Is the New Black, and Ready Player One. Those pretty much encompass the different styles casual readers like. I have a weird bee in my bonnet about Jodi Picoult, so I have no idea what I'd suggest to her readers. Are they the people who read Nicholas Sparks? There's probably a time and place for Nicholas Sparks in life, and I just haven't reached it yet. Or maybe I've filled that space with fanfic.
Yeah, that's probably it.
So the deal with Auntie Mame is that it's as great as finding a tub of toasted marshmallows and tiny kittens. Only I guess more sanitary. Whatever I'd still eat those marshmallows.
It's a book about an older, rich woman, narrated by her nephew Patrick. The whole book's written in episodes, which is the best because then you can flip back to your favorites, like when Auntie Mame visits Patrick's uber-WASP girlfriend and her parents at their summer home and everything is the worst but then Mame says All the Things to them and suddenly everything is sunshine and diamonds.
The movie with Rosalind Russell is stellar. And I think I saw it before I read the book. You should do both. And then read Around the World with Auntie Mame. And then weep, for there are no more Mame books to conquer.
Every time I find a stand-out book, I feel so much RELIEF, because I can answer the 'What's your favorite book?' question (which I've actually noticed gets asked less as an adult). When I was 10, it was Gone-Away Lake, which I had with this cover here and which I BELIEVE I got from Scholastic book orders.
Gone-Away Lake is about two cousins who're at some summer home and go wandering off through a swamp (my memory for this plot is 15 years old, so...) and happen upon a bunch of dilapidated but formerly grand turn-of-the-century houses, and two old residents, Minnie and Pindar.
I love books with backstory and detail, and Gone-Away Lake is pretty much Minnie and Pindar telling stories about the people who used to live in the now-falling-apart mansions. I'm also 90% this is the book that taught me what a philosopher's stone is. Elizabeth Enright, marry me.
Remember Diana Victrix? No? Ok, well, it's a New Woman novel written by a Wellesley grad in 1897, where the two ladies decide not to get married to gentlemen, because they do not love them, and instead they live together forever and preach about socialism.
IT IS THE GREATEST. And one of the main characters is described as "Enid was tall and broad and strong; her skin was smooth; her flesh was firm; her eyes were brown and clear, with golden lights in them, like the lights in her hair."
Yesssss tell me more of Enid.
Books like this bring me immense joy, because when you sit down and think about the canon, you start realizing it's partly bullshit, because do you know what how much political ridiculousness a novel has to go through to get approved and taught and there are SO MANY excellent works that have fallen through the cracks of Time because not enough school board members decided they were representative of the values they wished to promote. I STRONGLY ENCOURAGE YOU to try to root out at least one or two non-famous books a year.
When people have asked me for recommendations (which I am hilariously bad at, by the way, because I just want to make everyone read the above), I've found myself leaning towards: The Sisters Brothers, Tell the Wolves I'm Home, The Invention of Wings, Orange Is the New Black, and Ready Player One. Those pretty much encompass the different styles casual readers like. I have a weird bee in my bonnet about Jodi Picoult, so I have no idea what I'd suggest to her readers. Are they the people who read Nicholas Sparks? There's probably a time and place for Nicholas Sparks in life, and I just haven't reached it yet. Or maybe I've filled that space with fanfic.
Yeah, that's probably it.
![]() |
That'll fill the space |
↧
↧
High School Locker Lessons
Everyone's kind of a tool in their own special way in high school. And later in life you (hopefully) look back and say "Ha, look at how much of a tool I was back then. Thank God I'm only like that in different ways now."
I'm in a weird position, brain-orientation-wise, because I'm a big rule follower, but then I have my "hey fuck the rules, man" part of my brain, which inevitably gets shushed down at least a little by the other part. This was a much bigger battle when I was a conservative Christian, because while I felt like there was something not exactly right about all the things my Christian high school was telling us, I also felt like they were trying to follow the Bible and God, and maybe I should have some humility about this whole process and at age 17 maybe I didn't know better than all my teachers. Maybe.
But I had this other part that kept saying "YOU MUST RAGE AGAINST THE MACHINE, SELF." This primarily manifested itself on my locker.
I had our school rulebook memorized, and one of the many rules was you could not have things on your locker that promoted smoking, drinking, swearing, or generally licentious behavior (paraphrasing here). I had a picture of Gillian Anderson and David Duchovny dancing (!) in my 8th grade locker that I remember tearing down during an impromptu inspection:
Dancing was not allowed. We were basically Footloose but with Christian rock.
Decorating the outside of my locker was a Thing for me. I've basically always been into weird stuff that no one else cares about (stay tuned for my book review of ThePretender novelization!), but I also have constantly felt this unfortunate, Quixote-level need to explain that stuff to everyone around me, feeling like if they get it, they'll love it too.
So I'd put notecard-long opera synopses on my locker, switching them out once a week. I put up"Save [Show No One's Ever Watched or Heard Of]" signs. I remember feeling anxious about a Katharine Hepburn picture because she was smoking, but all the principal said when she passed by was "Oh, I love Katharine Hepburn."
The week before senior year started, I came into school, locker decorations in hand, and carefully taped them all up in a predetermined order. These things would show who I was. These things would teach my fellow classmates about people and places they'd never heard of. These things would LIFT THEIR SOULS to realms hitherto unimagined.
Then when I came back to school for the first day of class, this is what was sticking to my locker:
Almost everyone is more impassioned as a teenager than they are later in life when they've learned to calm down. Looking at the things we did then and thinking about how we'd do them differently can be a measuring stick for how far we've come as people. I think the main thing I'd tell myself is to 1) Stop worshiping Charlotte Bronte; it's weird. 2) Read some books you disagree with, particularly regarding theology. 3) Ask your classmates what THEY like, and STOP talking about whether or not Queen Elizabeth did or did not have sex 450 years ago.
(for the record, she totally didn't, unless it was after menopause, which is the only argument I'm buying)
I'm in a weird position, brain-orientation-wise, because I'm a big rule follower, but then I have my "hey fuck the rules, man" part of my brain, which inevitably gets shushed down at least a little by the other part. This was a much bigger battle when I was a conservative Christian, because while I felt like there was something not exactly right about all the things my Christian high school was telling us, I also felt like they were trying to follow the Bible and God, and maybe I should have some humility about this whole process and at age 17 maybe I didn't know better than all my teachers. Maybe.
But I had this other part that kept saying "YOU MUST RAGE AGAINST THE MACHINE, SELF." This primarily manifested itself on my locker.
I had our school rulebook memorized, and one of the many rules was you could not have things on your locker that promoted smoking, drinking, swearing, or generally licentious behavior (paraphrasing here). I had a picture of Gillian Anderson and David Duchovny dancing (!) in my 8th grade locker that I remember tearing down during an impromptu inspection:
![]() |
Ok they're probably not even dancing, but it looks like they COULD be |
Dancing was not allowed. We were basically Footloose but with Christian rock.
Decorating the outside of my locker was a Thing for me. I've basically always been into weird stuff that no one else cares about (stay tuned for my book review of ThePretender novelization!), but I also have constantly felt this unfortunate, Quixote-level need to explain that stuff to everyone around me, feeling like if they get it, they'll love it too.
So I'd put notecard-long opera synopses on my locker, switching them out once a week. I put up"Save [Show No One's Ever Watched or Heard Of]" signs. I remember feeling anxious about a Katharine Hepburn picture because she was smoking, but all the principal said when she passed by was "Oh, I love Katharine Hepburn."
The week before senior year started, I came into school, locker decorations in hand, and carefully taped them all up in a predetermined order. These things would show who I was. These things would teach my fellow classmates about people and places they'd never heard of. These things would LIFT THEIR SOULS to realms hitherto unimagined.
Then when I came back to school for the first day of class, this is what was sticking to my locker:
The rules had been changed over the summer, and in an attempt to have the school look more orderly, nothing was allowed to be posted on lockers. Infuriated, I appealed to the principal, but was told that things had "gotten out of hand," and this new rule made things easier. I took the monstrous composite home, made my pretentious sign to go under it, and stuck them on my bedroom wall.
What were the precious words that would enlighten and transform my fellow students? From top to bottom:
1. "WHERE is Emily Jones?" - My high school had a revolving door of terrible English teachers. It got to the point that junior year, my best friend and I made up a teacher named Emily Jones, who would be a mentor, friend, and role model. She would be 27 years old, brilliant, caring, and look just like Marla Schaffel at the 2001 Tony Awards. We got close to writing fanfic. We really wanted Emily Jones.
2. "I am tolerably well convinced that I shall never marry at all. Reason tells me so, and I am not so utterly the slave of feeling but that I can occasionally hear her voice," Charlotte Bronte - I don't even know what was going on here. Maybe a rebellion against the fact that we were constantly being trained for marriage by our teachers. Except for that one parent volunteer who told me God might have intended me for a life of celibacy. Thanks for that, ma'am.
3. "Laws and principles are not for times when there is no temptation."- This is the only quote I memorized from Jane Eyre that wasn't obviously linked to Jane and Mr Rochester doin' it. My rule-loving self was constantly tortured by this quote, as I would set forth rules for myself, break them, read this quote on my door, and then berate myself. Apparently I wanted my classmates to feel awful as well.
4. "To be a king and wear a crown is a thing more glorious to them that see it than it is a pleasure to them that bear it," Queen Elizabeth I - When I was 17, I was obsessed with both Jane Eyre AND Elizabeth I, so I was really fun to be around. If memory serves, most of junior year was spent defending Elizabeth's virginity, which for some reason my classmates decided to doubt. Probably because it drove me into a fury anytime they did it.
5. "With regard to the banning of Harry Potter books: I object to being allowed to read anything that does not conform to my present values. The purpose of reading and education is, after all, to reinforce values that are already known and accepted. To question those ideas is dangerous because it threatens divergent thinking which may result in dissent."
I wrote that. That's just me being a little shit.
Almost everyone is more impassioned as a teenager than they are later in life when they've learned to calm down. Looking at the things we did then and thinking about how we'd do them differently can be a measuring stick for how far we've come as people. I think the main thing I'd tell myself is to 1) Stop worshiping Charlotte Bronte; it's weird. 2) Read some books you disagree with, particularly regarding theology. 3) Ask your classmates what THEY like, and STOP talking about whether or not Queen Elizabeth did or did not have sex 450 years ago.
(for the record, she totally didn't, unless it was after menopause, which is the only argument I'm buying)
↧
Lady Audley's Rip-Roaring Secret Continues: "The indolent recklessness of intoxication" is my new favorite phrase
Oh man SO MUCH IS HAPPENING amirite? At the end of chapter 32, I was all "DAMNIT I should've ended the week's reading here," but then chapter 33 happened and BOOM.
Some of you might have noticed the possibly anti-feminist (but who can TELL in 1862) paragraph that mentions "pearl powder and Mrs. Rachael Levison," and I STRONGLY ENCOURAGE YOU to look at this fun post about her. Also, maybe we should all become best friends with the author of that site? Maybe? Catherine Pope, call me. We'll do lunch over Skype. Because you live in England.
THAT'S SOME BULLSHIT, VICTORIANS.
The rest of the post will be a summary of what has happened with Lady Audley, aided by Liz Lemon GIFs as I have decided she and Lady Audley are the same person.
So Robert's away from Audley Court, but then finds out Sir Michael is sick, and he OBVIOUSLY suspects Lady Audley of maybe-almost-killing-him, so he shuffles over there in a jiffy, only to find Lady Audley sitting by Sir Michael's bed like "What? No, I'm very concerned about my husband. Oh hey, why were you talking to that guy who knows like 1% of my past? Did he tell you anything? Probably nothing, right? Did you see my golden ringlets?"
Robert's super-gay for Clara Talboys, so he sticks to his quest to discover Lady Audley's Big Dark Secret, which we THINK we know, but then there's an old letter from before she probably killed George, where she says to her father "You know the secret which is the key to my life." Which...huh.
Robert heads back to Audley Court, sees Clara again, who STILL has "[his] lost friend's face" and is his "beautiful companion" whose "thraldom" he must escape. He then tips his hand to Lady Audley AGAIN BECAUSE HE'S AN IDIOT. He seems to think she'll just up and leave despite ALREADY probably having committed murder to keep all her fancy shit.
So Robert tells her he's going to Reveal All to Sir Michael, and Lady Audley basically loses her mind and goes all Lady Macbeth while trying to figure out how to not lose EVERYTHING and have to live in poverty like her mother UGH her mother don't even bring her up.
So then she super-unsuspiciously is like "Oh hey, Phoebe Marks, what was that? Robert's staying at your inn? And it's basically built of oily rags and matches? How about we just wander over on this frigid March evening at midnight and have a look-see?"
Then she tries to murder two people by burning them alive.
And spends a chapter trying to look innocent but WHO SHOULD WALK IN AT THE END OF OUR READING BUT UNBURNED-TO-DEATH ROBERT AUDLEY.
Some of you might have noticed the possibly anti-feminist (but who can TELL in 1862) paragraph that mentions "pearl powder and Mrs. Rachael Levison," and I STRONGLY ENCOURAGE YOU to look at this fun post about her. Also, maybe we should all become best friends with the author of that site? Maybe? Catherine Pope, call me. We'll do lunch over Skype. Because you live in England.
[I]f she thinks that I love her, and has been led to think so by any word or act of mine, I'm in duty bound to let her think so to the end of time
THAT'S SOME BULLSHIT, VICTORIANS.
The rest of the post will be a summary of what has happened with Lady Audley, aided by Liz Lemon GIFs as I have decided she and Lady Audley are the same person.
So Robert's away from Audley Court, but then finds out Sir Michael is sick, and he OBVIOUSLY suspects Lady Audley of maybe-almost-killing-him, so he shuffles over there in a jiffy, only to find Lady Audley sitting by Sir Michael's bed like "What? No, I'm very concerned about my husband. Oh hey, why were you talking to that guy who knows like 1% of my past? Did he tell you anything? Probably nothing, right? Did you see my golden ringlets?"
![]() |
Lady Audley confessional booth |
Robert's super-gay for Clara Talboys, so he sticks to his quest to discover Lady Audley's Big Dark Secret, which we THINK we know, but then there's an old letter from before she probably killed George, where she says to her father "You know the secret which is the key to my life." Which...huh.
![]() |
PERHAPS |
Robert heads back to Audley Court, sees Clara again, who STILL has "[his] lost friend's face" and is his "beautiful companion" whose "thraldom" he must escape. He then tips his hand to Lady Audley AGAIN BECAUSE HE'S AN IDIOT. He seems to think she'll just up and leave despite ALREADY probably having committed murder to keep all her fancy shit.
So Robert tells her he's going to Reveal All to Sir Michael, and Lady Audley basically loses her mind and goes all Lady Macbeth while trying to figure out how to not lose EVERYTHING and have to live in poverty like her mother UGH her mother don't even bring her up.
![]() |
The conversation seems to go like this |
So then she super-unsuspiciously is like "Oh hey, Phoebe Marks, what was that? Robert's staying at your inn? And it's basically built of oily rags and matches? How about we just wander over on this frigid March evening at midnight and have a look-see?"
Then she tries to murder two people by burning them alive.
And spends a chapter trying to look innocent but WHO SHOULD WALK IN AT THE END OF OUR READING BUT UNBURNED-TO-DEATH ROBERT AUDLEY.
↧
I'm Back and Half-Conscious
I'm back from New York/BEA, People Who Knew I Was There! To others — I was in New York City at BEA! Given that I've been lugging tens of pounds of books from New York to Chicago and have only just now collapsed in my apartment, chicken broth and ginger in hand (I might have picked up some germs in disease-ridden, City That Never Sleeps New York), obviously you should look forward to posts, but not today. Aside from this one. Here's the trip in brief:
I shall see you all tomorrow. Probably.
![]() |
You know who you are, sir |
I shall see you all tomorrow. Probably.
↧